Birthrites: Healing After Caesarean.

Caesarean Birth:
Making Informed Choices.

Booklet References:
(*Not Ob' Questions and Answers section)

  1. De Costa, C. 'A Sort of Progress'. Lancet 1998;351:1202-03
  2. Goer, H. 'Obstetric Myths and Research Realities'. 1995 Bergin and Garvey. Page 22
  3. 'Report of the Australian & New Zealand neonatal Network 1999' Deborah Donoghue, Ann Cust. Pg 14-15.
  4. Health Dept of WA. 'Perinatal Statistics in Western Australia Sixteenth Annual Report of the WA Midwives Notification System' Pg 20-21, April 2000
  5. Quinlivan J, Petersen RW, Nichols CN. Patient preference the leading indication for elective caesarean section in public patients -> Results of a 2-year prospective audit in a teaching hospital. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 1999; 39:207-214.
  6. Enkin M et al. 'A guide to effective care in pregnancy and childbirth'. 2000. Oxford University Press p.362
  8. 'The Pregnancy Centre' http://www.thepregnancycentre.com
  9. 'Australian Breastfeeding Association' Website - http://www.breastfeeding.asn.au/index.html
  10. 'La Leche League International' Website - http://www.lalecheleague.org/
  11. Rosen MG Dickinson JC Westhoff CL 'Vaginal birth after caesarean: a meta-analysis of morbidity and mortality.' Obstet Gynecol 1991; 77:465-70.
  12. Mozurkewich EL and Hutton EK. 'Elective caesarean delivery versus trial of labour: A meta-analysis of the literature from 1989 to 1999'. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;183:1187-97.
  13. Enkin M et al. ibid p368 Appleton B et al. Vaginal birth after caesarean section: an Australian multicentre study. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2000; 40:1: 87-91.

'Common Questions and Answers' References:

  1. Crawford K and Walters JC. Natural childbirth after caesarean. Blackwell Science, 1996.
  2. Perinatal data collection unit. Victoria 1999.
  3. Flamm BL et al. Elective repeat caesarean delivery versus trial of labour: A prospective multicenter study. Obstet Gynecol 1994;83:927-32
  4. Impey L and O'Herlihy C. First delivery after caesarean delivery for strictly defined cephalopelvic disproportion. Obstet Gynecol 1998;92:799-803.
  5. Jongen VHWM et al. Vaginal delivery after previous caesarean section for failure of second stage of labour. BJOG 1998; 105: 1079-81.
  6. Caughey AB et al. Trial of labour after caesarean delivery; The effect of previous vaginal delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;179:938-41.
  7. Zelop et al. Effect of previous vaginal delivery on the risk of uterine rupture during a subsequent trial of labour. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;183:1184-6.
  8. Chua S and Arulkumaran S. Trial of scar. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 1997;37: 6-11.
  9. Phelan JP et al. Vaginal birth after caesarean. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987; 157:1510-5.
  10. Molloy BG et al. Delivery after caesarean section: review of 2176 consecutive cases. BMJ 1987; 294: 1645-7.
  11. Zelop CM et al. Uterine rupture during induced or augmented labour in gravid women with one prior caesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 181: 882-6.
  12. Rageth et al. Delivery after previous caesarean: a risk evaluation. Obstet Gynecol 1999; 93: 332-7.
  13. Turner M. Delivery after one previous caesarean section. AmJOG 1997;176:741-4.
  14. Lydon-Rochelle M et al. Risk of uterine rupture during labour among women with a prior caesarean delivery. NEJM 2001;345: 3-8.
  15. Leung AS et al. Uterine rupture after previous caesarean delivery: Maternal and foetal consequences. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993;169:945-50.
  17. Chattopadhyay SK et al. Planned vaginal delivery after two previous caesarean sections. BJOG 1994; 101: 498-500.
  18. Miller DA et al. Vaginal birth after caesarean: a 10-year experience. Obstet Gynecol 1994;84:255-8.
  19. Asakura H et al. More than one previous caesarean delivery: a 5-year experience with 435 patients. Obstet Gynecol 1995;85:924-9.
  20. Caughey AB et al. Rate of uterine rupture during a trial of labour in women with one or two prior caesarean deliveries. Am J Obstet Gynecol 99;181:872-6.
  21. Hofmeyr GJ, Kulier R. External cephalic version for breech presentation at term (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, 4, 2000. Oxford: Update Software.
  22. Flamm BL et al. External cephalic version after previous caesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 165:370-2.
  23. Schachter M et al. External cephalic version after previous caesarean section - a clinical dilemma. Int J Gynecol Obstet 1994; 45: 17-20.
  24. Ophir E et al. Breech presentation after caesarean section: Always a section? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989;161: 25-8.
  25. Sarno AP et al. Vaginal birth after caesarean delivery. Trial of labour in women with breech presentation. J Reprod Med 1989; 24: 831-3.
  26. Hannah ME et al. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet 2000; 356: 1375-83. http://www.thelancet.com/journal/vol356/iss9239/contents
  27. Flamm BL and Goings JR. Vaginal birth after caesarean section: Is suspected foetal macrosomia a contraindication. Obstet Gynecol 1989;74: 694-697.
  28. Rouse DJ and Owen J. Prophylactic caesarean delivery for foetal macrosomia diagnosed by means of ultrasonography. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;181:332-8

To find out how to obtain a free copy, or how you can organise to distribute the booklets, please click here